🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a prohibition on deploying national guard in the Oregon city, following a recent court ruling.

Judicial Panel Agrees to Reconsider Case

The federal appeals court decided on this week that it would rehear the legal dispute concerning the executive power with an larger panel of eleven justices. The court also overturned a previous decision from a three-judge panel that had sided with the administration.

Ongoing Dispute Over Troop Deployment

This legal directive represents the most recent turn in a long-running court case over whether the former president has the authority and valid reason to send national guard forces in the city. Approximately 200 federalized guard members have been in limbo since the end of September when the deployment effort was started in due to months of protests.

Differing Viewpoints

The federal government has claimed that federal officials at the ICE facility in south Portland were under attack, while city and state officials maintain that municipal police have command of the situation.

Contrary to descriptions of the city as “war ravaged”, residents have been posting videos of lush hiking trails and a thriving food scene, and planning activities such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the “militarization of our city”.

Recent Legal Actions

The Tuesday ruling came after a federal judge in Portland issued two temporary restraining orders this month – one blocking the federal control of the state troops, and another stopping the deployment of any military personnel in the state, after efforts to evade the first order by calling up troops from California.

On Monday, the appeals court had put the first ruling on hold – allowing command of state troops – but the second ruling stayed effective, blocking the actual deployment of the forces.

Full Panel Consideration

The Tuesday decision means the issue will be heard “en banc” – with all decisions under review simultaneously – by a group of eleven justices.

“This decision demonstrates that the truth matters and that the courts are striving to hold this administration accountable. The constitution restricts the president’s power, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a testing site for expansive government power,” stated the state attorney general in a official comment.

“The judicial body is sending a definite signal: the executive leader cannot send the military into US cities unnecessarily. We will continue defending Oregon’s laws, principles, and sovereignty as this case moves forward and our legal battle continues in the judicial system.”